- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 13:38:56 -0800
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- Cc: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "Edward O'Connor" <hober0@gmail.com>, Jeremy Keith <jeremy@adactio.com>, HTMLwg <public-html@w3.org>
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> > wrote: >> >> Replace it with a single multi-state attribute like "buffering" instead. >> Values "none", "auto" (the default) and "full", or similar. Unless there's a >> cleaner way to represent the semantics "this is (un)likely to be used".... > > I'm still unconvinced three states will actually be needed, but this > proposal sounds OK to me. At least it's forwards-extensible if more than two > states do turn out to be needed. The advantage with a separate 'noautobuffer' attribute is that if it turns out that no UA starts using heuristics when no buffering attributes are specified, the noautobuffer attribute effectively becomes a no-op, and can be removed in the future. / Jonas
Received on Sunday, 3 January 2010 21:39:49 UTC