Julian Reschke, Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:28:56 +0100: > Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> ... >> I'm not sure how markup in attributes is any worse than a data url, >> which contains precisely the same data and is in an attribute. The >> only difference is the name of the attribute and the escaping >> requirements. (There are a few practical differences between how data >> urls currently work and how @srcdoc works that can be significant, but >> they're not relevant to this particular concern of yours.) >> ... > > Well, data URIs are already there, while srcdoc would be a new > attribute, and we've been told by the editor that each new attribute > in HTML costs around 1 billion dollars in > specifying/implementing/deploying/documenting/teaching. > > Furthermore, the data: URI scheme allows you to specify the mime > type, so the HTML vs XHTML question is already answered. +1 Sounds very convincing to me. We don't need to invent @srcdoc just because we can. -- leif halvard silliReceived on Monday, 25 January 2010 21:32:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:08 UTC