- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 23:53:24 +0100
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: Denis Boudreau <dboudreau@webconforme.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, HTML WG Public List <public-html@w3.org>
Jonas Sicking, Tue, 5 Jan 2010 23:38:13 -0800: > So my question is why should we have @summary in the spec? As > far as I can tell all the problems that @summary aimed to solve, are > already solved by aria-describedby. And solved better than @summary > does. If we compare these 2 examples: <table aria-describedby="an_ID_somewhere"> <table summary="This table looks like so and so."> then, for @summary, we know what kind of text we are supposed to find there - a text that helps you read the table by describing its structure. Comparably, we don't know what kind of description aria-describedby will contain - I think we risk that it only points to vaguely related material. It is a general problem with the current draft that the only thing that is specifically dedicated to explain the table structure, is an obsoleted attribute - @summary. To replace @summary with ARIA we would need a new, dedicated ARIA attribute: <table aria-summarizedby="an_ID_somewhere"> -- leif halvard silli
Received on Wednesday, 6 January 2010 22:54:00 UTC