Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-35 aria-processing (ends 2009-12-17)

Hi Maciej,

How can an issue be closed that has open actions bound to it?

Since you closed ISSUE-35 aria-processing [1] that Cynthia originally
raised, will new issue(s) be opened to track Steve's two open ARIA
actions? They are ACTION-158 [2] and ACTION-138 [3]. Both of them are
currently bound to ISSUE-35.

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Laura

http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/35?changelog
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/158?changelog
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/138?changelog


On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 8, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> ISSUE-35 was raised 10 months ago to propose adding detailed requirements
> for ARIA to the HTML5 draft. Some time ago, ARIA was incorporated into
> HTML5, including references to provide the processing and conformance
> requirements. There has been some subsequent discussion, but no fundamental
> objection to the work. On the other hand, some specific details of
> HTML5+ARIA processing or conformance have been raised as bugs and/or issues.
>
> It seems that keeping ISSUE-35 open no longer has a great deal of value to
> the group. It seems more productive to suggest changes to the spec's ARIA
> processing individually, and to close this catchall issue to reflect the
> fact that ARIA has in fact been incorporated.
>
> If there are no objections, this issue will be closed on December 17, 2009.
>
> If anyone objects to closing this issue and tracking further refinements
> individually, then the chairs will promptly call for Change Proposals for
> ISSUE-35.
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/35
>
> Per the CfC, this issue is closed without prejudice. Individual changes to
> ARIA processing requirements can still be requested separately via the usual
> process.
> Regards,
> Maciej

-- 
Laura L. Carlson