- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:35:13 -0500
- To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Shelley Powers wrote: > Manu? My apologies. It also looks like I made the same copy/paste error on my request for issues 1/2: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/0533.html - Sam Ruby > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/30 >> >> The current status for this issue: >> >> - HTML4 had a longdesc attribute defined for the img element. The current >> Working Group draft does not. >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/objects.html#adef-longdesc-IMG >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/text-level-semantics.html#the-img-element >> >> - We have a Change Proposal to reintroduce this attribute: >> >> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ChangeProposals/longdesc >> >> The current draft was produced before we instituted the current process >> requiring rationale in commit messages, so if there are anybody who prefers >> the draft as it is (or even wants to make a different Change Proposal), what >> we need is a Change Proposal (possibly with "zero edits" as the Proposal >> Details), but with similar level of detail in the other sections to what >> Manu produced. >> >> In addition, at this time the Chairs would also like to solicit alternate >> Change Proposals, in case anyone would like to advocate a different change >> than the specific one in the existing Change Proposal. >> >> If no counter-proposals or alternate proposals are received by February >> 14th, 2010, we proceed with a Call for Consensus on Charles's Change >> Proposal. >> >> - Sam Ruby >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 13 January 2010 17:35:47 UTC