- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:06:02 +0100
- To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- CC: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Adam Barth wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> Adam Barth wrote: >>> The long term solution is to let plugins participate in the sandbox >>> security model and then add an allow-plugins directive that re-enables >>> them, which is where this thread started N thousand words ago. >> Indeed. >> >> Can we please try to make process here? > > Yes, that would be much better than going in circles here. :) > > There was another fellow from Adobe who was interested in helping with > specifying the API. Have you synched up with him? Leonard, are you subscribed to plugin-futures yet? >> I have started a Wiki page at <https://wiki.mozilla.org/Plugins:SandboxedPlugins>, > > That looks to be mostly requirements. I think we need someone to step > up and propose an API. I can help, but it will take me a bit to get > up to speed on NPAPI. We should continue this discussion on > plugin-futures. > ... I'd like to nail down what the requirements are first; this is, as Maciej pointed out, necessary for the discussion how to specify the allow-plugins attribute. Mapping the requirements to an API proposal doesn't appear to be hard... >> and I have also pointed >> out that HTML5 currently doesn't have a solid definition of "plugin" (see >> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/1275.html>) -- >> should I open a BugZilla issue for that? > > That can't hurt. :) I've done that in the meantime. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 17:06:44 UTC