Re: Browser implementations, prior to rec, used for justification

James Graham wrote:
> On 05/01/10 14:31, Shelley Powers wrote:
>> And autobuffer is from which released specification, where we have to
>> worry about legacy use?
> Usage is a matter of quantifiable fact, not a matter of W3C Rec track 
> status. If it is agreed that the legacy implied by released Firefox 
> makes the attribute name "autobuffer" unsuitable to resuse at this time 
> it is strictly irrelevant whether the legacy came from following a 
> "released specification", proprietary invention, an unintended bug, or 
> an amazingly improbable set of cosmic-ray induced bit flips on the build 
> machine.

Agreed by whom?

Firefox can be updated easily.

BR, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2010 13:58:45 UTC