- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:58:07 +0100
- To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- CC: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "Michael A.Puls II" <shadow2531@gmail.com>, "Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich" <k.scheppe@telekom.de>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
James Graham wrote: > On 05/01/10 14:31, Shelley Powers wrote: > >> And autobuffer is from which released specification, where we have to >> worry about legacy use? > > Usage is a matter of quantifiable fact, not a matter of W3C Rec track > status. If it is agreed that the legacy implied by released Firefox > makes the attribute name "autobuffer" unsuitable to resuse at this time > it is strictly irrelevant whether the legacy came from following a > "released specification", proprietary invention, an unintended bug, or > an amazingly improbable set of cosmic-ray induced bit flips on the build > machine. Agreed by whom? Firefox can be updated easily. BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2010 13:58:45 UTC