Jonas Sicking, Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:53:58 -0800: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: >>> Some responses are added in the wiki. >>> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/PoeticSemantics >>> >>> Already the first response from Peter Krantz suggests to use XHTML2 >>> or RDFa. >> >> It strikes me that this is an example of a language which we could have >> developed within HTML5, if Toby's Decentralized Extensibility proposal >> had been implemented in HTML5. > > Given that this is a proposal for a spec, doesn't the "applicable > specification" clause in HTML5 apply here? Meaning that HTML5 as it is > already is able to deal with this particular case. > > Not saying that HTML5 has solved all the decentralized extensibility > issues discussed in general. Just seems like this particular one is > potentially dealt with. I agree that Olaf's literary mark-up language could be a candidate for an applicable spec. How should he proceed to have it achieve that status? -- leif halvard silliReceived on Tuesday, 19 January 2010 20:03:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:08 UTC