- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:11:07 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>, public-html@w3.org
Sam Ruby, Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:07:49 -0500: > Leif Halvard Silli wrote: >> Tab Atkins Jr., Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:00:32 -0600: [...] >>> If they served it as application/xhtml+xml, then it would have been >>> XHTML. >> >> Even at that point it is still only a bag of bits. For example: IE >> might perform a sniff and interpret it as text/HTML. > > I'm not seeing much new information on this thread. Is there an > intent to produce a bug report on the current specification? If so, > how would you like to see it changed? I need to harness my bug filing efforts ... In the mean time, some new info: http://www.amplesdk.com/examples/aml/maps/ The page is served as text/HTML (more specifically with the HTML5 doctype) - to all Web browsers, and implements AmpleSDK's XML language - AML - with namespaces and everything, inside the <script> element. Perhaps limiting namespaces to the <script> element and children of the <script> element is worth a shot? (My 2.5 cent.) (Thanks to Shelley for her SVG articles at A List Apart, with reference to the very interesting Ample SDK.) -- leif halvard silli
Received on Sunday, 31 January 2010 21:11:42 UTC