- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:28:14 -0500
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "julian.reschke@gmx.de" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> >> The alternative which is clearly within the chair's discretion is: >> >> " With prior permission from the chairs, a high-level prose >> description of the changes to be made." >> >> Given Roy's rationale, I think allowing a change proposal with a >> high-level prose descriptions of the changes to be made would be >> useful. > > While we have not discussed the possibility of just a high-level > prose description without showing any detail, my own feeling is that > it would leave too much room for misinterpretation. I think we should seriously consider this. The alternative is that Roy's objection will simply be closed "without prejudice" and reopened at a later date; and I see little value in taking that approach. > Regards, Maciej - Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 22:28:47 UTC