- From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:22:02 -0600
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote: > Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> >> So it sounds like no one else has strong feelings. I therefore >> suggest that Ian should implement the fcaption/dlabel Change Proposal: >> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ChangeProposals/DdDtFcaptionDlabel >> >> I think it would be fine to pick either of<fcaption> or<figcaption>, >> and either of<dlabel> or<dsummary>. Once that change is made, the >> Chairs will post a Call for Consensus to close this issue by amicable >> resolution. > > Just to be clear, does this mean you're ruling out the other alternative of > using <summary>, as mentioned in the change proposal, or is the choice > between dlabel, dsummary and summary being left entirely to the editor's > discretion? I made a statement that summary is not acceptable. Summary is already being used for an attribute, and we don't need to create confusion. There are other options. > > -- > Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software Shelley > http://lachy.id.au/ > http://www.opera.com/ > >
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2010 14:22:35 UTC