- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 01:39:50 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > Some things that struck me as odd and perhaps worth improving: > > 1) The introduction has no normative content, and at least in the > dev.w3.org copy doesn't usefully link to the modules. Perhaps it should > be combined with either the Core or Vocabulary specs. Having non-normative parts if actually pretty common in the W3C (e.g. XML Schema and RDF both do this). > 2) The core spec defines parts of the vocabulary, including link types, > and the hidden, accesskey, contenteditable and draggable attributes. This was an attempt to address feedback raised through Bugzilla. > 3) Cross-module links appear to be broken or no longer links (thus > losing the cross-reference) in many cases. Cross-spec cross-references in general are apparently going to be supported at some future point by the preprocessor script that we use, so hopefully this will become a non-issue. (gsnedders, can you shed any light on this?) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 9 January 2010 01:40:18 UTC