Re: Issues 89 through 97

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Shelley Powers <> wrote:
> As noted with the recent @doc attribute discussion, Ian came into the
> group, barely wrote a couple of sentences that an implementor wants
> this, and when I asked for some more background on this new attribute,
> and justification for adding something that I feel is not something we
> _really_ want in the spec, I was told to dig for all of this
> information in the (many times contradictory) email messages.

The @doc attribute had been discussed pretty extensively previously.

Can you point out the contradictory information Ian gave in his messages?


Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 16:13:25 UTC