- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:12:38 -0600
- To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Cc: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote: > As noted with the recent @doc attribute discussion, Ian came into the > group, barely wrote a couple of sentences that an implementor wants > this, and when I asked for some more background on this new attribute, > and justification for adding something that I feel is not something we > _really_ want in the spec, I was told to dig for all of this > information in the (many times contradictory) email messages. The @doc attribute had been discussed pretty extensively previously. Can you point out the contradictory information Ian gave in his messages? ~TJ
Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 16:13:25 UTC