- From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:48:59 -0600
- To: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Cc: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote: >> I am concerned, though, about the fact, as you mentioned in your >> email, that the WhatWG HTML document has changed its name to WhatWG >> HTML, and that it includes items split out from the HTML5 >> specification. In fact, if elements such as details, progress, and >> meter are actually deleted (not split off), there will be potential >> variances now between the two documents. >> >> This is not a good idea. This is not a sound technical decision. > > What do you propose, short of effectively shutting down the WHATWG or > HTMLWG altogether? That would solve the problem, but doesn't seem > likely. > I was also just expressing an opinion, and this probably isn't a topic for this group. The folks at WhatWG will have to determine what's best for it. Shelley
Received on Monday, 11 January 2010 02:49:27 UTC