Re: <iframe doc="">

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 24, 2010, at 8:55 AM, Shelley Powers wrote:
>>
>> Sorry if I'm offending or hurting feelings, but there was no consensus
>>
>> on this. How could there be consensus on this? And now, the only way
>>
>> to reverse this unilateral decision is _we_ have to now go through the
>>
>> Decision process.
>>
>> There was quite a bit of discussion.  You were even in on it.
>>
>>
>> But there was no consensus. Not unless I missed Maciej doing a "call
>> for concensus on ...."
>>
>> I would not expect the Chairs to start doing that in the middle of mailing
>> list discussions.
>> In this case, I did see some people object before the fact to having markup
>> in attributes in general, I saw people supporting the change, and I saw some
>> people giving feedback on the details without endorsing one way or the
>> other.
>> This thread is veering awfully close to process discussion, so let's take it
>> to www-archive or otherwise offlist if we need to go deeper into such
>> questions.
>> Regards,
>> Maciej
>>
>
> This is a very legitimate discussion to have in this group. Ian made a
> unilateral decision in the midst of a discussion on whether this doc
> (or srcdoc as it's now known) should be added to the specification. We
> are disagreeing with this decision, and are expressing such a
> disagreement.
>
> By attempting to re-frame this into a procedure issue, only, you are
> stifling descent on this change.
>
> Shelley
>

Sorry, typo

dissent, not descent.

Shelley

Received on Sunday, 24 January 2010 17:22:26 UTC