- From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:21:53 -0600
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Jan 24, 2010, at 8:55 AM, Shelley Powers wrote: >> >> Sorry if I'm offending or hurting feelings, but there was no consensus >> >> on this. How could there be consensus on this? And now, the only way >> >> to reverse this unilateral decision is _we_ have to now go through the >> >> Decision process. >> >> There was quite a bit of discussion. You were even in on it. >> >> >> But there was no consensus. Not unless I missed Maciej doing a "call >> for concensus on ...." >> >> I would not expect the Chairs to start doing that in the middle of mailing >> list discussions. >> In this case, I did see some people object before the fact to having markup >> in attributes in general, I saw people supporting the change, and I saw some >> people giving feedback on the details without endorsing one way or the >> other. >> This thread is veering awfully close to process discussion, so let's take it >> to www-archive or otherwise offlist if we need to go deeper into such >> questions. >> Regards, >> Maciej >> > > This is a very legitimate discussion to have in this group. Ian made a > unilateral decision in the midst of a discussion on whether this doc > (or srcdoc as it's now known) should be added to the specification. We > are disagreeing with this decision, and are expressing such a > disagreement. > > By attempting to re-frame this into a procedure issue, only, you are > stifling descent on this change. > > Shelley > Sorry, typo dissent, not descent. Shelley
Received on Sunday, 24 January 2010 17:22:26 UTC