- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 23:41:23 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
Sam Ruby, Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:59:10 -0500: > Leif Halvard Silli wrote: >> Julian Reschke, Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:53:39 +0100: >>> Jonas Sicking wrote: >>>> For what it's worth, I agree with Shelley that would have liked a >>>> on-list discussion regarding this too. While it can be argued that >>>> it's an editorial change only, I would be shocked and surprised if it >>>> didn't have political effects too. Effects that I'm worried is going >>>> to slow down development of the spec. >>>> >>>> Specifically the split between vocabulary and core is something that >>>> I'm worried we'll debate to death. >>> +1 >> >> +1 >> >> Ian's splits looks like a an attempt to minimize or undo the impact >> of the fact that Microdata was split from HTML 5. The logics seems >> to be: If Microdata can't be in, then I'll split all sections out so >> that they all can be considered equally in/out of HTML. > > Let's not speculate further. All right - but this has me in doubt about whether I was right in expressing my support a FPWD of Microdata. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Saturday, 9 January 2010 22:41:58 UTC