W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: New split-out drafts

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 23:41:23 +0100
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <20100109234123625160.842d1be7@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Sam Ruby, Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:59:10 -0500:
> Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>> Julian Reschke, Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:53:39 +0100:
>>> Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>>> For what it's worth, I agree with Shelley that would have liked a
>>>> on-list discussion regarding this too. While it can be argued that
>>>> it's an editorial change only, I would be shocked and surprised if it
>>>> didn't have political effects too. Effects that I'm worried is going
>>>> to slow down development of the spec.
>>>> Specifically the split between vocabulary and core is something that
>>>> I'm worried we'll debate to death.
>>> +1
>> +1
>> Ian's splits looks like a an attempt to minimize or undo the impact 
>> of the fact that Microdata was split from HTML 5. The logics seems 
>> to be: If Microdata can't be in, then I'll split all sections out so 
>> that they all can be considered equally in/out of HTML.
> Let's not speculate further.

All right - but this has me in doubt about whether I was right in 
expressing my support a FPWD of Microdata.
leif halvard silli
Received on Saturday, 9 January 2010 22:41:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:07 UTC