Hi! Well, it doesn't eliminate the need of the mime, it just avoids the download dialog from appearing. Greetings!! -- Eduardo http://www.sirdarckcat.net/ On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:18 +0800, sird@rckc.at wrote: > > why not putting the sandboxed URL inside the sandbox attribute? > > anyway, it's just a suggestion, the new mime type is a great idea, now > > sandbox makes sense! > > > > <iframe sandbox="http://thesite.com/thesandboxed.html" > > sandboxsomething="no-scripts no-frames"> > > Using a new attribute rather than src seems like a sensible idea to me. > Legacy user agents won't load anything from: > > <iframe sandbox="http://example.com/sandboxed.html"></iframe> > > And won't pop up annoying dialogue boxes. It seems to eliminate the need > for an additional media type registration; and it makes things simpler > for those HTML publishers who are not au fait with configuring their web > servers. > > -- > Toby A Inkster > <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> > <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> > >
Received on Wednesday, 13 January 2010 06:46:23 UTC