- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:17:19 +0100
- To: Kornel Lesinski <kornel@geekhood.net>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Kornel Lesinski wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:28:56 -0000, Julian Reschke > <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > >> Well, data URIs are already there, while srcdoc would be a new >> attribute, and we've been told by the editor that each new attribute >> in HTML costs around 1 billion dollars in >> specifying/implementing/deploying/documenting/teaching. >> >> Furthermore, the data: URI scheme allows you to specify the mime type, >> so the HTML vs XHTML question is already answered. > > data: cannot be used (it's been explained before), but perhaps new URI > scheme could be created instead (e.g. data+sandbox)? This would degrade > safely in current browsers and we wouldn't have to create *-sandboxed > variant of every MIME type. It has been explained that @src and data: can't be used as-is without more work. I'm trying to find out what "more work" exactly means, and whether it's feasible. > ... BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 25 January 2010 21:53:31 UTC