W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: splits, discussions, and manic behavior

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:49:28 -0500
Message-ID: <4B48EBD8.60101@intertwingly.net>
To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
CC: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Laura Carlson wrote:
> Hi Shelley,
>> Our change procedure is based on items
>> beginning as bugs and then going through the issue tracker if the
>> editor disagrees.
> Yes. From all I can gather you followed the formal procedure. Step 0.
> Email is optional. But you CCd the group anyway.


>> I forgot to add that the end result of all this manic activity this
>> week is I believe the bugs I initially wanted to create as issues,
>> were mostly rejected, after the rather interesting mechanizations this
>> week. This does mean that I can now add these as issues, which I
>> wanted to do in the first place.
> I don't see why not. Sam, Maciej, Paul, this would be in accordance
> with the procedure, would it not?


> Best Regards,
> Laura

- Sam Ruby
Received on Saturday, 9 January 2010 20:50:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:07 UTC