- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:29:42 +0100
- To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Shelley Powers wrote: > I would like ensure, though, that the group is instructed that all > proposals, in support of zero-edits and otherwise, are also due this > time. That's not really fair, since a counter proposal should be able to address the rationale included in yours. So I don't believe a good counter proposal can be or should be written until after the initial change proposal has been received. Then there should also be some time permitted to make changes based on feedback and the content of the counter proposals. It's also not worth spending time writing a counter proposal to a proposal that may not even get written. If you don't get it in on time, then the issue will be closed and we won't have to worry about a counter proposal. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 15:30:19 UTC