- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:40:39 +0100
- To: "Shelley Powers" <shelley.just@gmail.com>, "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: "Michael A.Puls II" <shadow2531@gmail.com>, "Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich" <k.scheppe@telekom.de>, "HTMLWG WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:31:21 +0100, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote: > And autobuffer is from which released specification, where we have to > worry about legacy use? We have to worry about legacy use regardless of whether there are released specifications are not. There is no "released" specification that says <embed> is for plug-ins and can be used yet everyone supports it and sites depend on this. This is no different from a new feature <video> that is implemented on which sites depend. A released specification does not have much to do with it. The upside with <video> versus <embed> is that there is much more room for input on its specifics and the general idea. What we do not want I think is delaying all those features for many more years. It is important to evolve the Web. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2010 13:41:23 UTC