- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 01:57:57 +0100
- To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Cc: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, public-html@w3.org
Philip Jägenstedt, Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:05:07 +0100: > On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:44:44 +0100, Silvia Pfeiffer: >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Philip Jägenstedt : >>> On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:19:11 +0100, Leif Halvard Silli: >>>> Philip Jägenstedt, Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:35:54 +0100: [...] >> A third (fourth?) state of "nothing" struck me as necessary when ppl >> started writing that they are replacing the video element with an >> image and javascript to avoid loading anything at all. But I am happy >> to ignore this situation until we have more statistics on what people >> actually do. > > I quite like this too. If this WG doesn't care for it, perhaps > experiments with it could be done with a vendor prefix, like > "-o-nothing". I think many in the WG would be very positive about a "nothing" value. As for statistics etc, then for example the popular open source Flash player Flowplayer recommends image and javascript as the most important way to embed flash with their player. [1][2] Quote from [2]: "Absolutely killer feature of Flowplayer is the ease of installing multiple players on a page without any loss of performance." Flowplayer has a focus on hosting on one's own server rather than on sites like Youtube [3]. [1] http://flowplayer.org/demos/installation/splash-image.html [2] http://flowplayer.org/demos/installation/multiple-players.html [3] http://flowplayer.org/documentation/index.html -- leif halvard silli
Received on Wednesday, 6 January 2010 00:58:32 UTC