- From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:00:37 -0600
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 10:41 -0600, Shelley Powers wrote: >> >> Please do not enter tracker issues that aren't called for by the process. >> >> >> > >> > We have to disagree, then. >> > [...] >> > >> > How else are we supposed to track assignments, responsibilities, and >> > due dates, Maciej? > > Nobody said that the Canvas 2D drafts were under the responsibilities of > the HTML Working Group. As Maciej stated, the HTML Working Group never > decided to take on the work of a separate Canvas 2D specification yet. > You're trying to open tracker issues against documents that are not yet > on the table which, I agree with Maciej, wasn't the right approach. > > Philippe > > > But the initial document from which the 2D API was split is a document under control of this working group. How the split occurs is a concern for us, is it not? So who has responsibility over these two documents now, if we don't? Shelley
Received on Monday, 11 January 2010 17:01:07 UTC