Re: ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2 - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> This request covers both issues:
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/1
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/2
>
> The current status for this issue:
>
> - We have a Working Group draft that issues a POST request for hyperlink
> auditing purposes:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/history.html#hyperlink-auditing
>
> - We have a Change Proposal to removes this section and associated DOM
> attributes:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0235.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/0489.html
>
> The current draft was produced before we instituted the current process
> requiring rationale in commit messages, so if there are anybody who prefers
> the draft as it is (or even wants to make a different Change Proposal), what
> we need is a Change Proposal (possibly with "zero edits" as the Proposal
> Details), but with similar level of detail in the other sections to what
> Manu produced.
>
> In addition, at this time the Chairs would also like to solicit alternate
> Change Proposals, in case anyone would like to advocate a different change
> than the specific one in the existing Change Proposal.

I volunteer to write a zero-edits change proposal for this issue, as I
like what is currently defined in the spec.

~TJ