- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:07:42 -0800
- To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'd >> just like some discussion before any of them get accepted with nothing >> more than the OP's assertions being heard. If we had had a normal >> discussion and Hixie still said "Eh, I'm cutting <details>.", I would >> have been fine with it. I'd still disagree with the decision, but I'd >> at least know that it had been properly considered, which I do not >> feel is happening right now. >> >> I just don't like the mailing list being completely bypassed by the >> tracking database. Discussion should happen here, not in the bug >> tracker. >> > > We're told not to clutter up the email lists with these discussions, > to take items that are unlikely to reach lazy consensus through the > formal change proposal. My impression was that resorting to bugs was a second step if discussions on email list were not fruitful. The email list, as I understand it, is still our main form of communication, and still where most technical discussions are taking place. Otherwise, is there a reason we wouldn't cc the public-html list by default on all bugs? (There are ways to accomplish essentially this in bugzilla). / Jonas / Jonas
Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 18:08:34 UTC