W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2010

Re: <iframe doc="">

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:43:05 +0100
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20100114214305522611.c98a6a85@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Maciej Stachowiak, Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:52:20 -0800:
> On Jan 13, 2010, at 12:50 PM, Doug Schepers wrote:
>> Hi, folks-
>> Tab Atkins Jr. wrote (on 1/13/10 10:23 AM):
>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Leonard
>>> Rosenthol<lrosenth@adobe.com>  wrote:
>>>> I don't understand how you can assume that the destination of the
>>>> doc URL is going to be text/HTML?  Why couldn't the iFrame be
>>>> pointing to an SVG image, for example, or a PDF?  Those are also
>>>> valid (and in the latter case of PDF, quite common) things one
>>>> would put in an iFrame and wish to refer to...
>>> @doc doesn't take a url, it takes literal html code (with quotes
>>> escaped).  It is intended to help with the use of multiple<iframe>s
>>> on a page, especially @sandbox'd ones, so that you don't incur
>>> multiple network requests but still get the security benefits of
>>> framing the content such as blog comments.
>> The question still remains... would @doc allow SVG code, for example?
> Using SVG-in-HTML, yes (since it assumes a text/html MIME type). 
> Using the traditional XML serialization of SVG, no.

And if I serve the HTML5 document as application/xhtml+xml, then what? 
Would @doc then still expect text/html - only?
leif halvard silli
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2010 20:43:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:07 UTC