Tuesday, 1 April 2003
Friday, 28 March 2003
- [closed] danc-01 "graph equality"
- Re: [closed] macgregor-01, Distinguishing asserted and non-asserted triples
- Re: reminder: RDF Core specs in Last Call
- [closed] macgregor-01, Distinguishing asserted and non-asserted triples
Thursday, 27 March 2003
- domains and ranges in RDFS semantics
- Re: [closed] hendler-01 literals in parsetype collection
- Re: [closed] hendler-01 literals in parsetype collection
- Re: [closed] hendler-01 literals in parsetype collection
- Re: [closed] hendler-01 literals in parsetype collection
- [closed] RDF Core LC issue xmlsch-09
- [closed] RDF Core LC issue xmlsch-08
- Issue timbl-03 Collection Clutter
- Re: [closed] hendler-01 literals in parsetype collection
- Re: [closed] hendler-01 literals in parsetype collection
- Re: [closed] hendler-01 literals in parsetype collection
Wednesday, 26 March 2003
Tuesday, 25 March 2003
- Unnecessary {x a List} triples considered a waste
- [walter@natural-innovations.com: Re: [closed] hodder-01 (rdf-comments, link rel=)]
- Re: [closed] hodder-01
- Re: [Fwd: RDF Issues]
- Issue chas-01 aboutEachPrefix
- Re: [Fwd: RDF Issues]
- Re: [Fwd: RDF Issues]
- Re: [closed] hodder-01
- Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files''
- RE: Issue rdfs-xml-schema-datatypes
Monday, 24 March 2003
- Re: [closed] pfps-15 Say anything quote
- Re: [Issue needed] Re: Comments on RDF test cases
- Issue vass-02 property instances
- Issue vass-01 flat layering
- Re: Divergences between RDF Semantics and RDF Schema
- Fwd: [cosubmission] Issue xmlsch-12
- Issue JSR188-01
Sunday, 23 March 2003
Saturday, 22 March 2003
Friday, 21 March 2003
- Issue qu-04 RDF/XML serialization
- FW: Comments on RDF last call working drafts
- Re: Divergences between RDF Semantics and RDF Schema
- Re: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call
- Re: language correction
- Re: Issue qu-04 RDF/XML serialization
- Re: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call
- [Issue needed] Re: Comments on RDF test cases
- RE: [closed] jjc-01 rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf
- Re: [closed] pfps-15 Say anything quote
- Issue pfps-24 What is RDF Schema?
- Re: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call
- Re: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call
- Re: Comments on RDF test cases
- Re: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call
- Re: [closed] pfps-15 Say anything quote
- Re: Some comments on RDF Schema as RDF/XML
- Re: What is RDF Schema?
- Fwd: pfps-18,19,20,21 namespace v vocabulary
- Re: Comments for WD-rdf-schema-20030123
- Re: Comments on RDF test cases
- Comments on RDF test cases
Thursday, 20 March 2003
- [closed] hendler-01 literals in parsetype collection
- [closed] hendler-01 literals in parsetype collection
- Re: [closed] krech-01 emptyPropertyElt ambiguity
- [closed] jjc-01 rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf
- [closed] krech-01 emptyPropertyElt ambiguity
- [closed] hodder-01
- Re: pfps-08 last call comment on typed literals
- Fwd: pfps-08 last call comment on typed literals
- pfps-08 last call comment on typed literals
- Re: Please review RDF Last Call
- Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files''
- Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files''
- Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files''
Wednesday, 19 March 2003
- Re: [closed] pfps-15 Say anything quote
- RE: Issue xmlsch-12
- Re: [closed] pfps-15 Say anything quote
- Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files''
Tuesday, 18 March 2003
- Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files''
- Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files''
- Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files''
- Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files''
- Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files''
Monday, 17 March 2003
- Re: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF"
- Re: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF"
- Re: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF"
- Re: [closed] pfps-15 Say anything quote
Sunday, 16 March 2003
- RE: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF"
- Re: Issue: pfps-13 Datatype Facets [was: RE: What is an RDF datatype?
Friday, 14 March 2003
- Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents
- Re: summary of reification semantics issues (material for discussion).
- Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents
- Re: summary of reification semantics issues (material for discussion).
- Re: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF"
- Minor test case fix
- Re: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF"
- [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF"
Thursday, 13 March 2003
- Re: summary of reification semantics issues (material for discussion).
- Issue rdfs-xml-schema-datatypes
- Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR)
- Re: [closed] danc-03 rdf/xml reification examples
- Re: [closed] pfps-17 namespace v vocabulary
- [closed] danc-03 rdf/xml reification examples
- [closed] pfps-17 namespace v vocabulary
- [closed] pfps-15 Say anything quote
Wednesday, 12 March 2003
- [Fwd: RDF Issues]
- Issues tex-01, tex-02, williams-02 Re: RDF Concepts document Jan 23, lang comments
- Issues xmlsch-01,,12 Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents
Tuesday, 11 March 2003
- Re: Issue: pfps-13 Datatype Facets [was: RE: What is an RDF datatype?
- Issue timbl-02 semantics of reification
- Issues timbl-01 bagid needed
- Re: RDF Semantics: datatype entailments
- Re: RDF Semantics: IC / ICEXT
- Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT
- Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents
- Re: RDF Concepts document Jan 23, lang comments
Monday, 10 March 2003
- re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files''
- XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents
- Re: Please review RDF Last Call
Friday, 7 March 2003
Wednesday, 5 March 2003
- [Closed] RE: The FragId issue
- Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT
- Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT
Tuesday, 4 March 2003
- RE: The FragId issue
- [closed] Re: Comments for WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123
- Re: RDF Concepts document Jan 23, lang comments
- RE: The FragId issue
- Re: Comments for WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123
- Re: Two questions about bagid
Monday, 3 March 2003
Saturday, 1 March 2003
- Issue #pfps-14 Social Meaning
- Issue #jsr188-01 Global Datatyping
- [closed] Re: "sanction by" and other issues from:
- Issue #pfps-23 sanctioned by?
- Issue #pfps-22 reserved names in abstract syntax
- Re: Can RDF say anything about anything?
- Issue #jjc-01 rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf
- Re: Issue #pfps-16 What is the expressive power of RDF?
- Re: [new issue] Assertion and provenance
- Re: [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents
- RE: The FragId issue
Friday, 28 February 2003
- Issue #webont-01 rename rdf schema
- Issue #horrocks-01 semantics of rdfs:comment
- [closed] Re: Response to RDF Core on carrying XML/RDF in SOAP messages
- Issue #pfps-14 Social Meaning in Concepts and Abstract Syntax
- RDF Concepts document Jan 23, lang comments
- Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT
- Re: slight change to http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#rdfmodel
- Re: [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents
- Issue #macgregor-02 propositional attitudes
- Issue #macgregor-01 Distinguishing asserted and non-asserted triples
- Re: [new issue] Assertion and provenance
- [new issue] Assertion and provenance
- Impact of formal semantics on informal meanings
- Re: [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents
- Re: [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents
- Re: [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents
- Re: [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents
Thursday, 27 February 2003
- Re: [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents
- Re: [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents
- Re: [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents
- Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March
- [closed] Re: Use of datatyping
- Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT
- Re: RDF Semantics: IC / ICEXT
- Undefined terms in RDFS namespace
- Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March
Wednesday, 26 February 2003
- Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR)
- Re: RDF Semantics: subinterpretations
- Re: Social Meaning in Concepts and Abstract Syntax
- Re: RDF Semantics: IC / ICEXT
- Confusion about wrapping of XMLLiteral
- Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR)
- Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT
- Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR)
- [issue needed] Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents
- [closed] Re: RDF Primer: Minor typo in triples examples in section 2.3 & 4.4
- [closed] Re: Comments for WD-rdf-primer-20030123
- Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR)
- Re: RDF Semantics: subinterpretations
- Re: RDF Semantics: IC / ICEXT
- Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT
- Re: Social Meaning Boston 6 March
- Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR)
- Re: Form Post From Mozilla
Tuesday, 25 February 2003
Wednesday, 26 February 2003
Tuesday, 25 February 2003
- Form Post From Mozilla
- RDF Schema: typo in description of rdfs:domain of rdfs:comment?
- RE: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax"
- Re: Comments for WD-rdf-concepts-20030123
- Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR)
- Re: concepts doc: 404s aren't meaningful?
- Re: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax"
- Re: Issue #pfps-16 What is the expressive power of RDF?
- Re: Social Meaning in Concepts and Abstract Syntax
- Re: The FragId issue
- Re: [RDF-concepts:113-Various] Re: Social Meaning and RDF
- Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT
- [closed] Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS closure lemma / entailments from empty graph
- [closed] Re: RDF Semantics: subinterpretations
- [closed] Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT
- Issue #pfps-17,18,19,20,21 Re: What does RDF consider a namespace to be?
- Re: What does RDF consider a namespace to be?
- Re: Issue #pfps-16 What is the expressive power of RDF?
Monday, 24 February 2003
Tuesday, 25 February 2003
Monday, 24 February 2003
- Re: RDF Semantics: datatype entailments
- Re: RDF Semantics: subinterpretations
- Re: RDF Semantics review: RDFS closure lemma / entailments from empty graph
- Re: RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT
- Re: Issue #pan-01 Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects
- [closed] Re: RDF Semantics: another 11 comments
- RE: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax"
- Re: What does RDF consider a namespace to be?
- RE: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax"
- Re: RDF Semantics: IC / ICEXT
- Re: RDF Semantics: another 11 comments
- Re: RDF Semantics: 11 comments
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects
- An rdfs:Schema Class
- Issue #pfps-16 What is the expressive power of RDF?
- Re: [RDF-concepts:113-Various] Re: Social Meaning and RDF
- Issue #jjc-01 rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf
- Re: Response to RDF Core on carrying XML/RDF in SOAP messages
- Issue #williams-02 s/URIref/IRI/
- Re: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax"
- Issue #williams-01 What is a node in an RDF graph?
- Re: Comments for WD-rdf-primer-20030123
- Re: Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents
- [closed] Re: Comments for WD-rdf-testcases-20030123
- Comments for WD-rdf-schema-20030123
- Comments for WD-rdf-testcases-20030123
- Comments for WD-rdf-primer-20030123
- Comments for WD-rdf-concepts-20030123
- Comments for WD-rdf-mt-20030123
- Comments for RDF series Last Call Working Drafts
Saturday, 22 February 2003
Friday, 21 February 2003
- Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR)
- The FragId issue
- Issue of support of Bag/Alt in RDF
- Re: Issue #pan-01 Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects
- Re: [RDF-concepts:113-Various] Re: Social Meaning and RDF
- Re: [RDF-Concepts:109] What is the expressive power of RDF?
- Re: What does RDF consider a namespace to be?
- Re: [RDF-concepts:113-Various] Re: Social Meaning and RDF
- [concepts] Re: Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents
- rdfs:member for Collections and collection syntax?
- RDF Semantics review: RDFS closure lemma / entailments from empty graph
- RDF Semantics: another 11 comments
- RDF Semantics: datatype entailments
- RDF Semantics: subinterpretations
- RDF Semantics: use of functions IEXT / ICEXT
- RDF Semantics: 11 comments
- RDF Semantics: IC / ICEXT
- Re: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects
- Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR)
- Re: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call
- Re: Comment on Test Cases
- RE: Comment on Test Cases
- Re: Comment on Test Cases
- RE: Comment on Test Cases
- Response to RDF Core on carrying XML/RDF in SOAP messages
Thursday, 20 February 2003
- Comment on RDF comment
- Re: Comment on Test Cases
- Re: Comment on Test Cases
- Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents
- Comment on Test Cases
- Re: Issue #pan-01 Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects
- Re: Issue #pan-01 Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects
- Re: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax"
- Clarifications needed for the Collection construct
- Issue #qu-03 ontology subset of rdfs
- Issue #qu-02 rdfs:member functional?
- Issue #hendler-01 literals in rdf:parseType="Collection"
- Re: Comment on rdf:parseType="Collection"
- Re: Comment on rdf:parseType="Collection"
- Comment on rdf:parseType="Collection"
Wednesday, 19 February 2003
- Re: [RDF-concepts:113-Various] Re: Social Meaning and RDF
- Re: [RDF-Concepts:109] What is the expressive power of RDF?
- Re: What does RDF consider a namespace to be?
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects
- Re: Some comments on the spec of RDF Semantics
- [RDF-Concepts:111-Various] RDF core, database example, soc-entailment
- [RDF-Concepts:pfps-15] Can RDF say anything about anything?
Tuesday, 18 February 2003
Wednesday, 19 February 2003
- [RDF-Concepts:109] What is the expressive power of RDF?
- [RDF-concepts:113-Various] Re: Social Meaning and RDF
- Re: Issue #pfps-15 Can RDF say anything about anything?
- Re: Comments on RDF last call working drafts
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects
- Re: About rdfs:member and rdf:_nnn
Tuesday, 18 February 2003
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects
- Re: Use of datatyping
- Re: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call
- Use of datatyping
- Re: slight change to http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#rdfmodel
- Re: Issue #pfps-15 Can RDF say anything about anything?
- Issue #qu-01 Domain of rdfs:member
- Re: About rdfs:member and rdf:_nnn
- Re: About rdfs:member and rdf:_nnn
- Re: typo in appendix C of RDF Semantics
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects
- slight change to http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#rdfmodel
- Re: Issue #pfps-15 Can RDF say anything about anything?
- Comments on RDF last call working drafts
- Issue #pfps-15 Can RDF say anything about anything?
- "sanction by" and other issues from:
- Issue #pfps-14 the meaning of RDF tokens
- Re: issue number requested: was: Re: the meaning of RDF tokens
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects
- Issue #pan-01 Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects
- RE: language tags in typed RDF literals
- RE: language tags in typed RDF literals
- RE: language tags in typed RDF literals
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects
Monday, 17 February 2003
- FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call
- Re: issue number requested: was: Re: Can RDF say anything about anything?
- Re: issue number requested: was: Re: Can RDF say anything about anything?
- Re: issue number requested: was: Re: the meaning of RDF tokens
- issue number requested: was: Re: Can RDF say anything about anything?
- issue number requested: was: Re: the meaning of RDF tokens
- Re: Can RDF say anything about anything?
- Re: the meaning of RDF tokens
- Re: Can RDF say anything about anything?
- Re: the meaning of RDF tokens
- Re: Can RDF say anything about anything?
- Re: the meaning of RDF tokens
- RE: Social Meaning Boston 6 March
Sunday, 16 February 2003
Saturday, 15 February 2003
- typo in appendix C of RDF Semantics
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects
- Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning treating classes and properties as objects
Friday, 14 February 2003
- concepts doc: 404s aren't meaningful?
- Re: Social Meaning and RDF
- [closed] Re: two comments on RDF Schema spec
- Re: Two questions about bagid
- Re: Two questions about bagid
- [closed] Re: editorial/typo in WD-rdf-testcases-20030123, "in _the_ Charter of..."
- [closed] Re: RDFCore test case LC comment
- Re: language tags in typed RDF literals
- Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents
Thursday, 13 February 2003
- [closed] RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling
- Re: Can we express propositonal attitudes twards reified statements in RDF ?
- Re: language tags in typed RDF literals
- Re: Can we express propositonal attitudes twards reified statements in RDF ?
- Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents
- Re: Can RDF say anything about anything?
- Re: the meaning of RDF tokens
- Re: #danc-03 section 4.3 RDF Reification lacks RDF/XML examples
- Re: #hodder-01 WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123: RDF/XML with HTML and XHTML
- Re: WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123: RDF/XML with HTML and XHTML
- Re: section 4.3 RDF Reification lacks RDF/XML examples
- Re: `alternate' vs `alternative' (was Re: WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123: RDF/XML with HTML and XHTML)
- Re: WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123: RDF/XML with HTML and XHTML
- language correction
Wednesday, 12 February 2003
- Re: Can we express propositonal attitudes twards reified statements in RDF ?
- Re: Two questions about bagid
- Re: Please review RDF Last Call
- Can we express propositonal attitudes twards reified statements in RDF ?
- Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax"
- Re: Two questions about bagid
- Business Broadband
- RE: language tags in typed RDF literals
- Re: Two questions about bagid
- Re: Two questions about bagid
- Re: Two questions about bagid
- Re: Two questions about bagid
- Re: Can RDF say anything about anything?
- Re: Two questions about bagid
- language tags in typed RDF literals
Tuesday, 11 February 2003
- Re: Two questions about bagid
- Two questions about bagid
- Re: Can RDF say anything about anything?
- Re: `alternate' vs `alternative' (was Re: WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123: RDF/XML with HTML and XHTML)
- `alternate' vs `alternative' (was Re: WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123: RDF/XML with HTML and XHTML)
- Re: Can RDF say anything about anything?
- WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123: RDF/XML with HTML and XHTML
- Some comments on RDF Schema as RDF/XML
- Some comments on the spec of RDF Semantics
- Re: section 4.3 RDF Reification lacks RDF/XML examples
- Re: PICS in RDF: bagid examples, please?
- PICS in RDF: bagid examples, please?
- section 4.3 RDF Reification lacks RDF/XML examples
Saturday, 8 February 2003
- Re: editorial suggestion for RDF Test Cases: wording re 'identical'
- Re: editorial suggestion for RDF Test Cases: wording re 'identical'
- editorial suggestion for RDF Test Cases: wording re 'identical'
Friday, 7 February 2003
- Statings -- Much ado about nothing
- Re: XMLLiteral
- XMLLiteral
- questionable statement in RDF semantics
- error in Semantics document
- error in Semantics document
Thursday, 6 February 2003
- Re: Social Meaning and RDF
- Re: abstract class
- RDF graph equality
- Re: Social Meaning and RDF
- Re: Social Meaning and RDF
- Re: abstract class
- Re: abstract class
- Re: abstract class
- Re: Social Meaning and RDF
Wednesday, 5 February 2003
- Re: the meaning of RDF tokens
- RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling
- Re: Can RDF say anything about anything?
- Re: Can RDF say anything about anything?
- Social Meaning and RDF
- the meaning of RDF tokens
- Re: Please review RDF Last Call documents
Tuesday, 4 February 2003
- Re: RDF Primer: Minor typo in triples examples in section 2.3 & 4.4
- RDF Primer: Minor typo in triples examples in section 2.3 & 4.4
- RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling
- RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling
Monday, 3 February 2003
- Re: Please review RDF Last Call
- Re: Please review RDF Last Call
- Re: duplicate axioms in RDF MT doc
- Re: rdfs:Datatype rdfs:subClassOf ???
- Re: Please review RDF Last Call documents
- RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling
- RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling
Friday, 31 January 2003
- Re: Can RDF say anything about anything?
- Re: Issues danc-01 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts
- RE: Issue: pfps-13 Datatype Facets [was: RE: What is an RDF datatype?
- Re: Can RDF say anything about anything?
- rdf graphs in RDF Semantics
- Issue: pfps-13 Datatype Facets [was: RE: What is an RDF datatype?
- Re: Please review RDF Last Call
- Issue reagle-02 exc-c14n throughout [was Re: Please review RDF Last Call]
- issue reagle-01 Re: Please review RDF Last Call
- RE: What is an RDF datatype?
- RE: What is an RDF datatype?
- RE: What does RDF consider a namespace to be?
- RDF LCWGs comments: RDF core, database example, soc-entailment and typo
- Re: Can RDF say anything about anything?
- RE: What is an RDF datatype?
Thursday, 30 January 2003
- URis -> URIs
- Re: Please review RDF Last Call
- RE: What is an RDF datatype?
- Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary
- rdfs:Datatype rdfs:subClassOf ???
- RE: What is an RDF datatype?
- RE: What does RDF consider a namespace to be?
- duplicate axioms in RDF MT doc
- Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary
- What is the expressive power of RDF?
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Syntax document concerning blank node identifiers
- What is an RDF datatype?
- Re: slight emptyPropertyElt ambiguity
- What does RDF consider a namespace to be?
- What is RDF Schema?
- Can RDF say anything about anything?
- Please review RDF last call working drafts
Wednesday, 29 January 2003
- Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary
- Issue pfps-11 Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary
- SCHEMA TODO: Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary
- Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary
- Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary
- Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary
- Re: pointers to datatype sections in RDFCore Last Call WD's
- Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary
- Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents
- misplaced paren in gloss of existential introduction
- Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary
- Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary
- Re: RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents
- Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary
- editorial/typo in WD-rdf-testcases-20030123, "in _the_ Charter of..."
- [closed] Re: Comment on RDF Test Cases
- Re: Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary
- Re: Comment on RDF Test Cases
Tuesday, 28 January 2003
- Re: Please review RDF Last Call
- slight emptyPropertyElt ambiguity
- RDFCore last call WD's: Two comments on the RDF documents
- Divergences between RDF Semantics and RDF Schema
- Comments on informal meaning of the RDFS vocabulary
- Re: Issues danc-01 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts
- Re: Issues danc-01 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts
- Re: Issue danc-02 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts
- Re: Issue danc-02 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts
- Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Syntax document concerning blank node identifiers
- Re: Comment on RDF Test Cases
- Re: Comment on RDF Test Cases
- Issues danc-01 and danc-02 Re: 2 formalities in RDF concepts
- Comment on RDF Test Cases
- Please review RDF Last Call
- Please review RDF Last Call documents
- 2 formalities in RDF concepts
Monday, 27 January 2003
- Re: two comments on RDF Schema spec
- Re: two comments on RDF Schema spec
- Issue jang-01: Re: RDFCore test case LC comment
- RDFCore test case LC comment
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning Lbase translation of XML Literals
Sunday, 26 January 2003
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning XML Schema datatypes
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning Lbase translation of XML Literals
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning the translation into Lbase
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDFS closure rules
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning typed XML Literals and LV
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning typed literals with language tags
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning typed literals
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning datatypes
- Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning untyped literals
Saturday, 25 January 2003
Friday, 24 January 2003
- Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning Lbase translation of XML Literals
- Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning the translation into Lbase
- Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules
- Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDFS closure rules
- Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning typed XML Literals and LV
- Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning typed literals with language tags
- Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning typed literals
- Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning datatypes
- Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning untyped literals
- pointers to datatype sections in RDFCore Last Call WD's
- Re: Semantics issues
- Request for comments on last call candidate drafts of RDF specification
- Request for comments on last call candidate drafts of RDF specification
- RE: Semantics issues
Tuesday, 21 January 2003
Friday, 24 January 2003
Thursday, 23 January 2003
Tuesday, 21 January 2003
Monday, 20 January 2003
Sunday, 19 January 2003
- Re: other rdf:nodeID name thoughts
- Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
- Re: other rdf:nodeID name thoughts
- other rdf:nodeID name thoughts
Friday, 17 January 2003
Tuesday, 14 January 2003
- Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
- Re: name of rdf:nodeID attribute
- Re: name of rdf:nodeID attribute
- Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
- Re: name of rdf:nodeID attribute
- Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
- Re: name of rdf:nodeID attribute
- Re: name of rdf:nodeID attribute
- Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
- RE: rdf:nodeID and external entities?
- Re: parseType collection
- Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
- Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
- Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
Monday, 13 January 2003
- 最新新闻
- Re: Wrong test-case: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/test003
- Re: Wrong test-case: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/test003
- Re: parseType collection
- Re: parseType collection
- Re: Wrong test-case: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/test003
- Wrong test-case: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/test003
- Re: rdf:nodeID and rdf:parseType="Collection"
- Re: contents of a Collection
- Re: name of rdf:nodeID attribute
- RE: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
Sunday, 12 January 2003
- Re: Confusion about Collections
- Re: Confusion about Collections
- Re: contents of a Collection
- Re: Confusion about Collections
- rdf:nodeID and rdf:parseType="Collection"
- contents of a Collection
- Re: Confusion about Collections
- name of rdf:nodeID attribute
Friday, 10 January 2003
- Re: New Credit File Waiting!
- Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
- Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
- parseType collection
- Re: [jena-dev] Re: Use cases for Reification in RDF Triplestores
- automatic reification -- was ([jena-dev] Re: Use cases for Reification in RDF Triplestores)
- RE: [jena-dev] Re: Use cases for Reification in RDF Triplestores
- Re: [jena-dev] Re: Use cases for Reification in RDF Triplestores
- Re: [jena-dev] Re: Use cases for Reification in RDF Triplestores
- Re: [jena-dev] Re: Use cases for Reification in RDF Triplestores
Thursday, 9 January 2003
Tuesday, 7 January 2003
- Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
- Re: Vocab serialization equivalences
- Re: Vocab serialization equivalences
Monday, 6 January 2003
Friday, 3 January 2003
- problems with RDF literals
- Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
- Re: Fwd: Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
- Re: status of RDF, RDFS, and OWL ``namespace files''
- Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
- Re: Fwd: Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
- Re: review of LCC documents as of 26 December 2002
- Re: status of RDF, RDFS, and OWL ``namespace files''
- Re: status of RDF, RDFS, and OWL ``namespace files''
- status of RDF, RDFS, and OWL ``namespace files''