- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 07:37:34 -0500 (EST)
- To: gk@ninebynine.org
- Cc: Peter.Crowther@networkinference.com, bparsia@isis.unc.edu, hendler@cs.umd.edu, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org> Subject: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF" Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:57:31 +0000 > Subject: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF" > > You raised made a last call comment [pfps-14] captured in: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-14 > > The RDFCore WG has resolved: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0068.html > > to accept this comment, > > by removing the section on social meaning from the Concepts document, > per WG proposal: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0029.html > > Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating > whether this decision is acceptable. Hmm. I don't view this as a comprehensive response to my comments on this issue. I particular my message referenced in the issue list doesn't even mention the section on social meaning. I await identification of other changes that may be done in response to this comment. > Thank you for your attention, > > #g peter
Received on Friday, 14 March 2003 07:38:04 UTC