- From: Daniel \ <eikeon@eikeon.com>
- Date: 20 Mar 2003 17:30:35 -0500
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: "www-rdf-comments@w3.org" <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 17:03, Dave Beckett wrote: > Daniel > > You made a last call comment "slight emptyPropertyElt ambiguity" > captured in > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#krech-01 > > The RDFCore WG has resolved > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0068.html > > to accept this. > > Details: > > 1. The test case rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007 was > erronenously recorded as a negative test by the working group. > > 2. We will change: > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf > to make rdfms-nested-bagIDs test007 a test:PositiveParserTest > > 3. We will return rdfms-nested-bagIDs test007 to the original version > version that stated this as a positive. This means changing > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf > FROM: > rdf:bagID is forbidden on property element prop with an rdf:resource or > rdf:parseType attribute: the following is in error. > TO: > bagID on empty property element construction, with rdf:resource. > > 4. We note that the working draft section > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#emptyPropertyElt > consequently does not need to be changed. > > This is recorded in the RDF/XML Syntax Editors Draft change list as > syntaxLCC-003 > > Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating > whether this decision is acceptable. Yes, the decision is acceptable. > Dave -- Daniel Krech, http://eikeon.com/ Redfoot.net, http://redfoot.net/ RDFLib.net, http://rdflib.net/
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2003 17:29:19 UTC