- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 14:42:41 +0100
- To: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
WG: co-ordination: Brian either: - raise new issue for wowg 'literals in parsetype="Collection"', or add link to wowg from issue hendler-01 and: - raise new issue for wowg 'rdf:XMLLiteral' ambiguous or add link to wowg from issue reagle-01 (including link to test cases, assuming Jim agrees their relevance) === Hi Jim I am still not quite sure of the RDF Core process for handling e-mails that span our docs. I will discuss only the issues you raise under "WOWG comments on RDF language decisions". I hope other editors will further other issues. > i. Design of rdf:XMLLiteral and rdf:parseType="Literal": This seems to be a duplicate of the issue http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#reagle-01 XMLLiteral equality. We may assign a new issue ID or treat it under that one. Please could you confirm that: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/att-0532/01-msg.ht ml contains two relevant test cases that you would like RDF Core to consider. > ii.Constraints on rdf:parsetype="Collection" Appears to be an endorsement of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#hendler-01 if so, we may issue a new ID or treat it under the ID hendler-01. Jeremy
Received on Monday, 24 February 2003 08:42:51 UTC