- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 21:21:43 +0000
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
At 16:03 29/01/2003 -0500, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: [...] > > > > We seem to have switched to rdfs:label. The text at: > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_label > > > > is > > > > [[ > > rdfs:label is an instance of rdf:Property that is used to provide a > > human-readable version of a resource's name. > > > > A triple of the form: > > > > R rdfs:label L > > > > states that L is a human readable label for R. > > ]] > > > > Right, that could be tidied up: > > > > [[rdfs:label is an instance of rdf:Property that may be used to provide a > > human-readable version of a resource's name.]] > > > > Would that be better? > >Probably, but rdfs:label is much less of a problem than rdfs:comment. Danbri - does that seem like a reasonable change to you? I think that is one, that as editor, you have discretion to make. Brian
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2003 16:20:30 UTC