Unnecessary {x a List} triples considered a waste

This comes with apologies as a late last call comment on the RDF syntax 

I believe that in 7.2.19 Production parseTypeCollectionPropertyElt
  the wording

"""For each event nin s, the following statement is added to the graph:

n.string-value <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> 
<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#List> .


adds redundant triples to the graph.
I believe that waste of time and space at this level in the 
architecture is unnecessary, and that that wording should be removed 
(and any other reference to the adding type statements for Lists where 
a rdf:first is there).

It is trivial to restore the triples for anyone who wants them fro a 
graph without them,
{ ?x rdf:first ?y } =>  { ?x  a rdf:List }.

Clutter at this level of the semantic web stack is very much of a 

I am sorry that I had never noticed that line before.
I have been using lists for a long time without generating those 
redundant triples.

Tim BL

Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2003 18:20:02 UTC