- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 16:52:40 +0000
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, Dave Hodder <dmh@dmh.org.uk>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
missed the id in the subject line. Brian At 16:21 13/02/2003 +0000, Brian McBride wrote: >This has been recorded as a last call comment at: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#hodder-01 > >The WG will respond later with a disposition. > >Brian > > >At 10:59 13/02/2003 +0000, Dave Beckett wrote: > >> >>>Dave Hodder said: >> > >> > Hello, >> > >> > Regarding the following section: >> > >> > >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123/#section-rdf-in-HTML >> > >> > I feel it would be beneficial if a complete example was presented to >> > show how a <link> element could be used. On the www-html-editor list >> > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/2002OctDec/0027.html> >> > I suggested the following as an example: >> > >> > <link rel="meta" type="application/rdf+xml" >> > title="Dublin Core metadata" href="dublin-core.rdf"/> >> > <link rel="alternate meta" type="application/ntriples" >> > title="Dublin Core metadata (N-Triples)" href="dublin-core.nt"/> >> > >> > N.B. I would strongly suggest the use of the linktype 'Alternate' over >> > the 'Alternative' used in the WD; both 'Alternate' and 'Meta' are in the >> > latest XHTML 2.0 draft, but 'Alternative' is not. >> >>I will consider this suggestion. We will record this as a last call >>issue on this document since it is more than a typo. >> >>I note (or hope!) that the HTML working group is also looking at this >>document and at this section in particular and I might try to >>coordinate comments here. >> >> > >> > There is also a small typo in the second paragraph -- "HTML/HTML" is >> > referred to instead of "HTML/XHTML". >> >>Noted, will fix. >> >>Thanks for the feedback. >> >>Dave
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2003 11:51:32 UTC