- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:13:36 -0500 (EST)
- To: fmanola@mitre.org
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org> Subject: Re: the meaning of RDF tokens Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:10:33 -0500 [...] > > Only one last-call comment identifier is needed here, I think. However, I > > do not see any in the last-call comment list at > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues > > You won't see it there. There are two sets of change identifiers. The > ones listed at the URL you've cited are issues that have been referred > by the Editors of the relevant documents to the WG for decision. In > addition, each Editor is maintaining an internal set of change > identifiers for those changes they have accepted (as I have this one) > and are going to go ahead and fix. > > --Frank You mean without input from the rest of the working group, or even elevating it to an official comment? I am distinctly unhappy with this way of dealing with my comments. peter
Received on Monday, 17 February 2003 10:13:51 UTC