Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules

Pat, Peter,

I'm sending just one message about 10 comments.  I've recorded 10 comments 
for consideration by the WG:

   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-01
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-02
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-03
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-04
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-05
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-06
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-07
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-08
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-09
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-10

Brian

At 11:37 26/01/2003 -0700, pat hayes wrote:

>>The closure rules for RDF are incomplete.  There are XML documents
>>without an enclosing language tag that have the same canonical form as
>>XML documents with and enclosing language tag.
>
>Indeed? I confess I was unaware of this. Indeed, the rules need to be 
>re-stated to accommodate this possibility, by merging rdf2a and 2b into 
>one rule.
>
>This (or something logically equivalent) will be done.
>
>Pat
>
>
>--
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>IHMC                                    (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
>40 South Alcaniz St.                    (850)202 4416   office
>Pensacola                               (850)202 4440   fax
>FL 32501                                        (850)291 0667    cell
>phayes@ai.uwf.edu                 http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
>s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam

Received on Monday, 27 January 2003 08:50:01 UTC