- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:26:57 -0500
- To: pfps@research.bell-labs.com
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, brian_mcbride@hp.com
Peter, Thanks for your Last Call review comment on RDF Schema in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0149.html Sorry I'm late with these responses. You ask 'what is RDF schema?' and note that the specification appears unclear on this. Rather than treat this as an editorial fixup, I think it best that the RDFCore WG treat this as formal issue. Brian, could you create a LC open issue entry for this? Aside: I think this is related to the 'rename RDF Schema?' issue, ie. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#webont-01 in that as we've moved towards calling this a 'vocabulary description language', rather than 'RDF Schema', there is less tendency towards using the noun form, ie. we find ourselves asking what the RDFS/RDFVDL language is (answer: a semantic extension of RDF), rather than what _an_ RDF Schema is. Anyway, I agree that we could be clearer on this in the spec. Thanks for your careful attention, cheers, Dan
Received on Friday, 21 March 2003 08:26:59 UTC