- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 22:03:12 +0000
- To: Daniel Krech <eikeon@eikeon.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Daniel
You made a last call comment "slight emptyPropertyElt ambiguity"
captured in
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#krech-01
The RDFCore WG has resolved
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0068.html
to accept this.
Details:
1. The test case rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007 was
erronenously recorded as a negative test by the working group.
2. We will change:
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/Manifest.rdf
to make rdfms-nested-bagIDs test007 a test:PositiveParserTest
3. We will return rdfms-nested-bagIDs test007 to the original version
version that stated this as a positive. This means changing
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf
FROM:
rdf:bagID is forbidden on property element prop with an rdf:resource or
rdf:parseType attribute: the following is in error.
TO:
bagID on empty property element construction, with rdf:resource.
4. We note that the working draft section
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#emptyPropertyElt
consequently does not need to be changed.
This is recorded in the RDF/XML Syntax Editors Draft change list as
syntaxLCC-003
Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating
whether this decision is acceptable.
Dave
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2003 17:05:25 UTC