- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:36:12 +0000
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
At 05:37 25/02/2003 -0500, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: [...] > > I am recording this an issue against primer, concepts, syntax and > schema (a > > search of test cases and semantics for 'namespace' found no matches) to > > review the use of the term 'namespace'. > >I found 5 matches for ``namespace'' in RDF Semantics. I don't know if any >of them need any changes, but they are there. Oops you are right - how did that happen? Ok adding http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-21 I checked test cases. It contains the term but only in the names of files. >These are recorded as: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-17 > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-18 > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-19 > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-20 > > > > The WG will respond in due course. > > > > Is that satisfactory for now? > > > > Brian > >Hmm. For now, I suppose so, but this is in no sense a final resolution of >the issue. Right. This is just acknowledging and recording it. >Also, there is a general issue here, namely how should RDF use the term >``namespace'', that is unlikely to be satisfactorily addressed by >independant editorial action. Right. I've recorded the issue against each document - maybe that was overkill - to ensure that we address it in each doc, but we will discuss and ensure we have a consistent usage across all the docs. [...] Brian
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2003 08:35:10 UTC