- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 14:39:25 +0000
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Recorded as: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-13 Brian At 13:59 31/01/2003 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >Peter: > > So what happened to the XML Schema datatype facets? Are they > > part of RDF datatypes? > >Patrick: > > Facets are not part of RDF Datatypes. I made recommendations to the > > editors earlier to adjust the wording > >IMO, basically Patrick is right here. >I suggest we assign an issue against RDF Concepts on this one. The other >documents may need checking. It is IMO 'editorial'. > >However, we need to be careful to not suggest that xsd:int for example does >not have facets. It does; it is simply that they do not play a visible role >in RDF's use of the datatype. > >They do interact with the crucial lexical-to-value mapping, so they are >relevant to implementors of xml schema datatypes, and also to how RDF >semantics works. Crucially, if we have a derived XML Schema datatype then >certain semantics properties, of RDF documents using such a datatype, hold >depending on the value of the facets. > >Jeremy
Received on Friday, 31 January 2003 09:38:37 UTC