- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:00:59 +0100
- To: "Jan Grant" <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
> > > > moreover, > > [[ > > I think the test was correct as originally stated and is > currently incorrect. > > ]] > > > > (I am happy to ignore the procedural issue, really - but I did > follow the > > links and was disappointed = i.e. I still can't tell why this test got > > changed - nor can I tell why I didn't vote against such change) > > Brian, please give this an issue number. Yes please - I disaagree with this test, which is the substantive issue - an approved test that disagrees with the Syntax doc. > > Jeremy, the misunderstanding arose in the following week's teleconference: > > http://www.w3.org/2003/01/17-rdfcore-irc > > the exchange recorded (minimally) starting with timestamp 15:28:45 > > [[ > 15:28:45 [daveb-scr] gone some pending test cases > 15:29:03 [daveb-scr] either we approve them or leave till LC process > 15:29:07 [daveb-scr] bwm: what are pending? > 15:29:39 [daveb-scr] bwm: weren't they approved last week > 15:29:47 [daveb-scr] jang: ok > 15:29:52 [daveb-scr] bwm: approved, done here > ]] > > Pretty minimalist :). Jeremy
Received on Friday, 21 February 2003 05:01:20 UTC