- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 18:09:27 +0100
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, connolly@w3.org
Hi Dan thanks for your comment on goofy literals. Before the Working Group discusses this comment I wanted to check that you had seen the line in that subsection: [[ The lexical form is present in all RDF literals; the language identifier and the datatype URI may be absent from an RDF literal. ]] and find that insufficient. I take it that the text you would prefer is: [[ A literal in an RDF graph containing up to three components called: + The lexical form being a Unicode [UNICODE] string in Normal Form C [NFC] (required). + The language identifier as defined by [RFC-3066], normalized to lowercase (optional). + The datatype URI being an RDF URI reference (optional). A plain literal is one in which the datatype URI is absent. A typed literal is one in which the datatype URI is present. ]] Have I understood correctly, or could we just leave it as it is? Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2003 12:08:39 UTC