- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:09:48 +0000
- To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Aaron, I take your point. I think this is set to be reworked in the handling of issue pfps-14. Are you happy that I attach your comment to my notes for dealing with that issue? #g -- At 09:06 AM 2/14/03 -0600, Aaron Swartz wrote: >The concepts doc says: > >>Issuing an HTTP GET request and obtaining data with a "200 OK" response >>code is a technical indication that the received data was published at >>the request URI; but data received with a "404 Not found" response cannot >>be considered to be similarly published information. > >First, the f in Found should probably be capitalized. More importantly >though, I don't think that last bit is correct. Most people consider 404 >error pages to be published. For example, I think the author of: > >http://harrumph.com/404 > >would considered it a published document. > >-- >Aaron Swartz [http://www.aaronsw.com/] ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:19:58 UTC