- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 13:37:20 -0500 (EST)
- To: jjc@hpl.hp.com
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com> Subject: Re: Issue: pfps-13 Datatype Facets [was: RE: What is an RDF datatype? Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 16:38:44 +0100 > > Hi Peter > > I seem to have ended up owning this issue; and don't know what you would like > to do. I believe that my message was in response to some working in one or more of the RDF specs that says something like: 1/ An RDF datatype *is* (just like) an XML Schema datatype. 2/ An RDF datatype has only a lexical space, a value space, and a lexical-to-value map. These two statements are contradictory, so something has to give. I don't care which something. peter > > Here's my summary: > > you asked > [[ > So what happened to the XML Schema datatype facets? Are they part of RDF > datatypes? > ]] > > Patrick answered: > [[ > Facets are not part of RDF Datatypes. > ]] > > Brian answered: > [[ > I don't recall the WG deciding this. > ]] > > Jeremy answered: > [[ > we need to be careful to not suggest that xsd:int for example does > not have facets. It does; it is simply that they do not play a visible role > in RDF's use of the datatype. > ]] > > Options: > 1: do nothing > 2: add informative text (e.g. a note) reminding the reader that XS datatypes > have facets, but they do not interact directly with RDF datatyping. > > Do you have a preference, or a third possibility? > > Jeremy > > > > > >
Received on Sunday, 16 March 2003 13:37:45 UTC