- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:32:01 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, "jos.deroo.jd" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > This is a last call comment concerning the test case schema > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/testSchema > > which I am making wearing the hat of an OWL Test Case editor. > > (Sorry I should have made this comment earlier). > > Within OWL Tests we reuse the RDF testSchema. > Unfortunately the rdfs:comment-s within it, do not foresee such reuse. For > example test:issue should be described as relating a test to an issue, rather > than a test to an RDF Core issue. > > Please generalize the comments on the following resources > test:approval > test:issue > test:status > > > e.g. > > <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Indicates the status of the test according to > RDF Core WG process.</rdfs:comment> > > => > > <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Indicates the status of the test within a > process, such as the RDF Core WG process.</rdfs:comment> I'm in complete agreement with this. The comments on the schema document have been updated to generalise them (in addition, correcting the comment for NegativeEntailmentTest). -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ Generalisation is never appropriate.
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2003 05:32:38 UTC