Re: [new issue] Assertion and provenance

At 13:29 28/02/2003 +0000, Graham Klyne wrote:

[...]

>I think your concerns can be expressed thus:
>
>1. The Concepts document is not clear that RDF does not define a mechanism 
>for distinguishing asserted and non-asserted forms.

Recorded as

   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#macgregor-01

Thanks Bob for your comments.  The WG will consider this and get back to 
you in due course.

Brian

Received on Friday, 28 February 2003 09:34:52 UTC