- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 10:04:31 -0700
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>I believe that there are errors in the treatment of typed literals in >the RDF model theory. For example, let I be an interpretation where >rdf:XMLLiteral and ex:bar both denote the domain element. However, >the typed literal "xx"^^ex:bar does not necessarily denote the same >thing as "xx"^^rdf:XMLLiteral because the rule for rdf:XMLLiteral uses >the URI reference directly, and not its denotation. This is true. HOwever, the issue is moot for RDF as RDF provides no way to state the identity that would be needed to create this situation. Of the extant SW languages, only OWL-Full has the needed expressive power, in fact. I do not regard this situation as an 'error', in any case. Whether to allow equality reasoning over datatype names for the built-in datatype is an option, and the decision to choose one way rather than another is a design decision. I have no strong opinions one way or the other, but it would be easy to modify the wording of the MT to accommodate either view. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Sunday, 26 January 2003 12:03:12 UTC