- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 10:40:07 +0000
- To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
At 10:50 18/02/2003 +0200, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: > > ... seemed at the time to be important to Patrick > > who stated that > > Nokia felt strongly about the issue. > > > > - later Patrick reported that after further thought, that > > whilst Nokia > > still preferred the lang tag to be allowed in a datatyped > > literal, they > > could live without it. > > > > ... > > > > >(1) lang tags be forbidden by the RDF syntax from appearing > > in non-XML > > >typed literals. > >This option is preferred. Hi Patrick, Can I check what you are saying here. Are you saying, of the two options, this is the one you would prefer, or are you advocating removing lang tags from the abstract syntax for non-XML typed literals. Brian
Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2003 05:39:37 UTC