- From: Marc Carrion <marc_carrion@yahoo.es>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 02:53:49 -0800 (PST)
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, marc@jfcarrion.com, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
--- Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
> At 02:00 06/02/2003 -0800, Marc Carrion wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > would be true, but if we only have
> > _:xxx rdf:type rdf:Statement .
> > _:xxx rdf:subject <ex:a> .
> > _:xxx rdf:predicate <ex:b> .
> > that would not be a 'correct' model, I mean
> it's
> >going to have a wrong Resource of type Statement.
>
> Not true. That looks like a fine graph to me.
> [...]
>
> > I was thinking that Abstract Classes could be
> >defined in the same way.
>
> Sorry Marc, I'm not following you. Is this formal
> communication with the
> working group. We are in last call at the moment,
> and kinda busy.
>
> What are you trying to say here?
>
> Brian
>
I'm sorry I don't want to bother you when you are
busy, I'm sure this can wait.
Marc
=====
......\|||/................................................
(. .)
-oOOo---0---oOOo-------
|marc_carrion@yahoo.es|
| ooO Ooo |
----( )--( )-----------
() ()
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2003 05:53:50 UTC