- From: Marc Carrion <marc_carrion@yahoo.es>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 02:53:49 -0800 (PST)
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, marc@jfcarrion.com, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
--- Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote: > At 02:00 06/02/2003 -0800, Marc Carrion wrote: > > [...] > > > would be true, but if we only have > > _:xxx rdf:type rdf:Statement . > > _:xxx rdf:subject <ex:a> . > > _:xxx rdf:predicate <ex:b> . > > that would not be a 'correct' model, I mean > it's > >going to have a wrong Resource of type Statement. > > Not true. That looks like a fine graph to me. > [...] > > > I was thinking that Abstract Classes could be > >defined in the same way. > > Sorry Marc, I'm not following you. Is this formal > communication with the > working group. We are in last call at the moment, > and kinda busy. > > What are you trying to say here? > > Brian > I'm sorry I don't want to bother you when you are busy, I'm sure this can wait. Marc ===== ......\|||/................................................ (. .) -oOOo---0---oOOo------- |marc_carrion@yahoo.es| | ooO Ooo | ----( )--( )----------- () () __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2003 05:53:50 UTC