- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 21:31:39 -0500
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Dave- I am willing to accept this decision contingent on one thing - I want the issue being postponed to point to this message as well as (or instead of) the original message. The reason is that, as you will see in a minute, I realize that the issue I raised goes beyond the OWL dependency which I originally discussed. The actual issue: RDF/XML does NOT provide a reasonable syntax for expressing a closed list of values of literals or other datatypes. That is, supposing I wish to represent that "my scraper found only the following set of names on URI1" I wish to say something like: <:NameList rdf:parsetype="collection"> <rdf:closedListItem>fred </rdf:closedListItem> <rdf:closedListItem> joe </rdf:closedListItem> <rdf:closedListItem> bill </rdf:closedListItem> </:Namelist> (note: I have made up the above, it is not intended to be currently correct nor to imply this is the right syntax to use) If I use current RDF constructs I have no way to produce this as a closed list. In short, parsetype=collection is not only useful for the OWL oneOf construct, but for any other time when a closed list must be used. I believe that it would be very useful for RDF/XML to have a means by which such closed lists of datatype elements could be used. -Jim Hendler AC, Mind Laboratory, University of Maryland At 22:46 +0000 3/20/03, Dave Beckett wrote: >Jim, > >You as AC Member, MIND Laboratory made a last call comment "Comment >on rdf:parseType="Collection"" captured in > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#hendler-01 > >Your email raising the issue: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0322.html > > >The RDF Core WG has resolved > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0068.html > >to postpone this issue on the grounds that: > > * It would require extensive changes to the current syntax specification. > * It is not a critical requirement for the WebOnt WG. > * It would involve considering several different approaches, taking > time and consequent changes to the RDF/XML Syntax, Test Cases, > Primer working drafts and implementations. > >Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating >whether this decision is acceptable. > >Dave -- Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 240-731-3822 (Cell) http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2003 21:31:53 UTC