- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 10:50:21 +0200
- To: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
> ... seemed at the time to be important to Patrick > who stated that > Nokia felt strongly about the issue. > > - later Patrick reported that after further thought, that > whilst Nokia > still preferred the lang tag to be allowed in a datatyped > literal, they > could live without it. > > ... > > >(1) lang tags be forbidden by the RDF syntax from appearing > in non-XML > >typed literals. This option is preferred. And I would go so far as to remove the XMLLiterals "datatype" since it is such an odd duck (and even more so if lang tags are omitted from other typed literals) and revert back to the original idea of three kinds of literals: simple, XML, and typed. Only the first two types of literals take lang tags. Patrick -- Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2003 03:50:26 UTC